Dr Lincoln Tracy1, Dr Sandra Reeder1,2, Dr Michelle Gold3, Associate Professor Heather Cleland4

1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 2Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 3Palliative Care Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia, 4Victorian Adult Burns Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract:

Burn care clinicians are required to make critical decisions regarding the withholding and withdrawal of treatment in patients with severe and potentially non-survivable burn injuries. Little is known about how Australian and New Zealand burn care specialists approach decision-making for these patients. This study aimed to understand clinician beliefs, values, considerations, and difficulties regarding palliative and end-of-life (EoL) care discussions and decision-making following severe burn injury in Australian and New Zealand burn services. An online survey collected respondent and institutional demographic data as well as information about training and involvement in palliative care/EoL decision-making discussions from nurses, surgeons, and intensivists in Australian and New Zealand hospitals with specialist burn services. Twenty-nine burns nurses, 26 burns surgeons, and 15 intensivists completed the survey. Respondents were predominantly female (64%) and had a median of 15 years of experience in treating burn patients. All respondents received little training in EoL decision-making during their undergraduate education; intensivists reported receiving more on-the-job training. Specialist clinicians differed on who they felt should contribute to EoL discussions. Ninety percent of respondents reported injury severity as a key factor in their decision-making to withhold or withdraw treatment, but less than half reported considering age in their decision-making. Approximately two-thirds indicated a high probability of death or a poor predicted quality of life influenced their decision-making. The three cohorts of clinicians had similar views toward certain aspects of EoL decision-making. Qualitative research could provide detailed insights into the varying perspectives held by clinicians.


Biography:

Dr Lincoln Tracy is a Research Fellow within the School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University. He undertakes research identifying objective and verifiable data on treatment, outcomes, and quality of care to encourage higher standards of burn injury prevention and care.